cryx: (danger)
I like to do coursera free courses, as I find ongoing learning fun and satisfying.

My course this weekend was talking about intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. One of the studies showed the effect of rewarding a task that was innately satisfying with money for performance, and the effect that had on performance over time.

Initially there is a spike in performance of the rewarded compared to the unrewarded control group, but then for the sessions after, performance drops compared to the control group. As part of the experiment, after the 'monitored' time they were left alone and thought they were unmonitored. In the control group, people still generally performed the task as it was 'fun', but the group who'd been rewarded had a much lower rate of doing so. They weren't being paid, so why bother?

I think this has interesting repercussions for the 'be paid for what you love' movements. For example, that you may end up not loving it as much, or you won't doing it as much if the money is not coming in. It's important to note, though, that there seems to be a difference on whether the pay is for performance (successful completion of tasks), vs not being tied to performance.
From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

cryx: Me, infront of a wall, with surprisingly dark hair (Default)
cryx

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags